«Industry 4.0»: information technologies utilization for reducing the man-made impact of tree harvesting machines

M.Yu. Vasenev


This article considers an actual question about which technological changes affect the modern logging machines and all forestry within the frameworks of «Industry 4.0» conception. There is disclosed the concept as «Forestry 4.0», is given the characteristic of its basis: «The Real Environment», «The Internet of Forest», «NextGen Fibre Supply Chain», «Data Analytics». There is given an assessment to changes, which involve a hardware-software component of technics and the scheme of interactions between machines and systems within the frameworks of «Industry 4.0» (symbiosis of machines, Internet of Things and cyber-physical systems). There is provided an empirical formula, by the means of it one can to estimate correspondence of logging machine’s technique to this conception, and use recommendations are given. There are stated main unfavorable factors caused by forest technics, namely: negative impact on the ground and soil oil pollution. There are distinguished some models of «future» logging machines, their relevance for forestry on the current level of progress is estimated. There is discussed a point, tied to remotely-operated tree harvesting machines, are singled out existing combinations of telecontrolled machines. An urgency of their use is highlighted (where human performance is forbidden).  There are made conclusions about prospects of «Industry 4.0» technologies adoption in Russian wood harvesting organizations and Russian-sourced logging machines. There are brought main factors, braked their progress, f.e.: psychological people’ unreadiness to accept the innovations and absence of required skill set and necessity of engineering plans rebuilding, which were formed by years.

Full Text:

PDF (Russian)


Bodryshev S.V. Industry 4.0: today’s realias. ISUP. 2018. no. 4.

Vasenev M.Yu. Main preconditions and motivational factors for adaptation forest machines automated control systems. Informatsionnye tekhnologii v nauke, upravlenii, sotsial'noj sfere i meditsine: sbornik nauchnykh trudov IV Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferentsii. Tomsk. TPU. 2017. pp. 107–109.

Gingras J.-F., Charette F. FPInnovations’ Forestry 4.0 Initiative. 2017.

Remmel T., Perera A. Mapping Forest Landscape Patterns. Springer, 2017. 333 p.

Tang L., Shao G. Drone remote sensing for forestry research and practices. Journal of Forestry Research. 2015. vol. 26. no. 4. pp. 791-797.

Liu J., Shi Y., Fadlullah Z.M., Kato N. Space-air-ground integrated network: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. 2018. vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2714-2741.

Serra-Diaz J.M., Enquist B., Maitner B., Merow C., Svenning J.-C. Big data of tree species distributions: how big and how good? Forest Ecosystems. 2018. 4:30.

Parker R., Bayne K., Clinton P. Robotics in forestry. New Zealand Journal of Forestry. 2016. vol. 60. no. 4. pp. 8-14.

Gavrikov V. Industry 4.0: ST sensors predict faults of industrial equipment. Novosti jelektroniki. 2018. no. 12.

Vasenev M.Yu. Industrial ethernet as improvement factor of logging machines. Vestnik of Volga state university of technology. Series «Materials. Constructions. Technologies. 2019. no. 1. pp. 78-84.

EtherCAT Technology Group. URL: https://www.ethercat.org/ (accessed 15.07.2019).

About approval of Strategy of Russian timber complex development to 2030. Available at: http://government.ru/docs/all (accessed 17.07.2019).

Voskobojnikov I.V., Kondratyuk D.V. Problems and prospects of forest equipment production. Mezhotraslevoj al'manakh - Delovaya slava Rossii. 2015. no. 49. pp. 18-21.

Russia 4.0: the fourth industrial revolution as stimulus of global competitiveness. Available at: https://tass.ru/pmef-2017/articles/4277607 (accessed 18.07.2019).

Kiselev D.S. Reduction of rutting on duty of forest machines on waterlogged lands: author’s abstract of dissertation. Arkhangel'sk. 2013.

Vadbol'skaya Yu.E., Azarenok V.A. The reducing negative impacts of forest machinery on soils thinning. Lesa Rossii i khozyajstvo v nikh. ¬2015. no. 3. pp. 36-40.

Porsinsky T., Pentek T., Bosner A., Stankic I. Ecoefficient Timber Forwarding on Lowland Soft Soils. Chapter 17. Croatian National GHG Inventory Report. 2012.

Mellgren P.G. Terrain Classification for Canadian Forestry. Canadian Pulp and Paper Association. 1980. pp. 1-13.

Owende P.M.O, Lyons J., Haarlaa R., Peltola A., Spinelli R., Molano J. and Ward S.M. Operations protocol for eco-efficient wood harvesting on sensitive sites. Project ECOWOOD. 2002. pp. 1-74.

Weight indicator for forestry forwarders.Available at: www.agriexpo.online/prod/ponsse-ab/product-182197-60072.html (accessed 20.07.2019).

Crane control with surefire benefits. Available at: www.komatsuforest.com/forest-machines/our-forwarders/forwarder-options (accessed 20.07.2019).

Kunitskaya O., Shchetneva Ya. An impact of fuels and lubricant spills by lumbering operations on environment. LesPromInform. 2016. no. 4. pp. 54-60.

Lossan A. Forest in expectation of digital technologies. Lesnaya promyshlennost'- Forestry. 2019. no. 67.

Regan P. John Deere 1270 Harvester. Available at: https://topgearrussia.ru/reviews/ (accessed 25.07.2019).

Zhanashtaev A. Industry 4.0: what disturbs Russian corporates to introduce new technologies. Available at: https://rb.ru/opinion/industriya-40/ (accessed 25.07.2019).

Thoben K.D., Wiesner S., Wuest T. Industrie 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing – A Review of Research Issues and Application Examples. International Journal of Automation and Technology. 2017. vol. 11. no.1. pp. 4-16.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Abava  Absolutech IT-EDU 2019

ISSN: 2307-8162