Symbolic Regression based Solution for the Optimal Control Problem with Constraints

Askhat I. Diveev, Oubai Hussein, Elizaveta Shmalko


This article presents a numerical solution to the problem of optimal control of objects in an environment with phase constraints. The proposed approach of synthesized optimal control consists of two steps. First, the problem of synthesizing the stabilization system of an object relative to some point in the state space is solved. The resulting feedback control system is added to the mathematical model of the control object and then the problem of the optimal location of stabilization points, which are essentially attractors, is solved. To solve the synthesis problem, methods of symbolic regression are used, which are completely machine treated, universal and independent of the type of control object. An example of solving the optimal control problem for a group of quadrocopters moving a cargo on flexible rods in a space with constraints is given.

Full Text:



R. Chertovskih, N.T. Khalil, F.L. Pereira, D. Karamzin “Path-constrained trajectory time-optimization in a three-dimensional steady flow field” // 18th European Control Conference, ECC 2019, pp. 3746-3751.

A.V. Arutyunov, D.Yu. Karamzin “Properties of extremals in optimal control problems with state constraints” // Differential Equations, 52(11), 2016, pp. 1411-1422

L.C. Young Lecture on the calculus of variations and optimal control theory, AMS Chelsea publishing, Providence Rhode Island, 2000.

N.K. Khalil “Nonlinear Systems”, 3rd Ed., published by Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall, 1996, 750 p., 2002.

Rao A.V. “A Survey of Numerical Methods for Optimal Control” // Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, January 2010, 135 (1), pp. 1-32.

M. Krstic, M. Kanellakopoulos, P.V. Kokotovic “Adaptive nonlinear control without overparametrization” // Systems & Control Letters. 1992. Vol. 19, Iss. 3. P. 177—185.

A.D. Mizhidon On a Problem of Analytic Design of an Optimal Controller // Automation and Remote Control, 2011, vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 2315-2327.

M. Cutler, J. P. How “Actuator Constrained Trajectory Generation and Control for Variable-Pitch Quadrotors” // AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference (GNC). Minneapolis, Minnesota, August 2012.

S.L. Zenkevich, N.K. Galustyan “Synthesis and testing of an algorithm for controlling the motion of a quadrocopter along a trajectory. // Mekhatronika, avtomatizatsiya, upravleniye. 2015; 16(8): 530-535. (in Russian)

M. Krstic, I. Kanellakopoulos, P.V. Kokotovic “Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design”, Wiley, New York, 1995

Podvalny S.L., Vasiljev E.M. Analytical synthesis of aggregated regulators for unmanned aerial vehicles // Journal of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 239, no. 2, May, 2019. pp. 135-145.

E. Alibekov, J. Kubalik, R. Babuska “Symbolic Method for Deriving Policy in Reinforcement Learning”, Proc. 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), December 12-14, Las Vegas, USA, 2016, pp 2789-2799.

A.I. Diveev, E.Yu. Shmlako, Self-adjusting control for multi robot team by the network operator method, 2015 European Control Conference (ECC), July 15-17, 2015. Linz, Austria

A.I. Diveev “Numerical methods for solving the control synthesis problem”, RUDN (in Russian), 2019.

J.R. Koza. Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, MA: MIT Press, 1992. -- 819 p.

A.I. Diveev “Small Variations of Basic Solution Method for Non-numerical Optimization”, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2015, volume 48(25) pp. 028-033.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Abava  Кибербезопасность MoNeTec 2024

ISSN: 2307-8162