Digital Twin for R&D organization: approaches and methods

Fedor Krasnov, Mars Khasanov

Abstract


Competition encourages business to adopt the concept of digital twins. In some industries, digital twins have already found their place: there are digital twins of factories and cities. However, in industries where knowledge is the main product, digital twins are not yet in such demand. There is no doubt that scientific organizations have an internal core, corporate culture, values, which allow them to carry out unique research works. By modeling these internal, hidden, latent features of an organization, we can get unique tools for forecasting and managing a technical strategy. The digital twin of the science and technology center can be viewed as a particular type of model that reveals such hidden phenomena as the emergence of new research areas, the formation of scientific schools and the degree of creative burnout and fatigue of the team. Prototyping, as an engineering discipline, has existed for more than 30 years and, at first glance, does the same. However, unlike the prototype, the digital twin does not set goals for the rapid implementation of basic functionality for analyzing the operation of the system as a whole. Therefore, to understand the advantages of digital twin, we need to understand the new features that it provide. Going from the particular to the general, the authors selected a research and technology center for research and considered approaches to building a digital twin, and then summarized these approaches. As a result, an up-to-date formulation of research hypotheses was obtained, which need to be checked before creating a digital twin of an organization or its part aimed at producing new knowledge.

 


Full Text:

PDF (Russian)

References


Nadhan D., Mayani M. G., Rommetveit R. Drilling with Digital Twins / IADC/SPE asia pacific drilling technology conference and exhibition. — Bangkok, Thailand: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2018. — P. 18.

Gholami Mayani M., Rommetveit R., Oedegaard S. I., Svendsen M. Drilling Automated Realtime Monitoring Using Digital Twin. — Abu Dhabi, UAE: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2018. — P. 11.

Van Os J. The Digital Twin throughout the Lifecycle. — Providence, Rhode Island, USA: The Society of Naval Architects; Marine Engineers, 2018. — P. 8.

Føllesdal Tjønn A. Digital Twin Through the Life of a Field. — Abu Dhabi, UAE: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2018. — P. 6.

Poddar T. Digital Twin Bridging Intelligence Among Man, Machine and Environment. — Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Offshore Technology Conference, 2018. — P. 4.

Saini G., Ashok P., Oort E. van, Isbell M. R. Accelerating Well Construction Using a Digital Twin Demonstrated on Unconventional Well Data in North America. — Houston, Texas, USA: Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, 2018. — P. 13.

Sharma P., Knezevic D., Huynh P., Malinowski G. RB-FEA Based Digital Twin for Structural Integrity Assessment of Offshore Structures. — Houston, Texas, USA: Offshore Technology Conference, 2018. — P. 6.

Allen T. J., others. Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the r&D organization // MIT Press Books. — The MIT Press, 1984. — Vol. 1.

Noe R. A., Hollenbeck J. R., Gerhart B., Wright P. M. Human resource management. — China People’s University Press, 2006.

Cooley C. H. Social organization. — Transaction Publishers, 1956.

Krasnov F., Dokuka S., Yavorskiy R. Team assembly in r&D: A review of imitating modeling approach for science and technology center in oil&Gaz industry // International Journal of Open Information Technologies. — 2018. — Vol. 6, no. 1. — P. 17–24.

Block P., Grund T. Multidimensional homophily in friendship networks // Network Science. — Cambridge University Press, 2014. — Vol. 2, no. 2. — P. 189–212.

De Nooy W., Mrvar A., Batagelj V. Exploratory social network analysis with pajek. — Cambridge University Press, 2018.

Moreno J. L. Who shall survive? Foundations of sociometry, group psychotherapy and socio-drama. — Beacon House, 1953.

Mullins N. C. The development of specialties in social science: The case of ethnomethodology // Science Studies. — Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA, 1973. — Vol. 3, no. 3. — P. 245–273.

Chuan P. M., Ali M., Khang T. D., Dey N., others. Link prediction in co-authorship networks based on hybrid content similarity metric // Applied Intelligence. — Springer, 2018. — Vol. 48, no. 8. — P. 2470–2486.

Chen Y., Ding C., Hu J., Chen R., Hui P., Fu X. Building and analyzing a global co-authorship network using google scholar data / Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web companion. — International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2017. — P. 1219–1224.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Abava  Absolutech IT-EDU 2019

ISSN: 2307-8162