Formalization of the definition of the relationships of indicators in the model for assessing the quality of complex objects

S. V. Mikoni

Abstract


A heuristic and expert approach to establishing a correlation of concepts in ontological models contrasts the formalized approach. The method of determining the role of each concept in a pair of matched concepts depends on the specific type of connection. Three groups of connections are considered: generic, aggregate and functional. For each of the groups it is proposed to use their own method of analysis. To determine the relationships of indicators in the model of assessing the quality of complex objects, an instrumental connection and a summing relationship (a kind of influence links) that generalizes the instrumental connection are selected. In terms of the goal tree, an indicator that specifies a particular goal is viewed as a means of achieving the goal. The complex index of the upper level is concretized by the characteristics inherent in it by the method of finding the octants of the verbal noun. The relationship between it and the indicator of the lower level of the hierarchy is established when the names of the corresponding concepts coincide. To increase the effectiveness of the coincidence of names, all synonyms of a character characterizing a complex indicator are involved. The article reflects the further development of the case study, the first results of which were published in the materials of the International Scientific Conference Internet and Modern Society (IMS-2018) and the International Seminar "Computer Linguistics".


Full Text:

PDF (Russian)

References


Semenov S.S. Ocenka kachestva i tehnicheskogo urovnja slozhnyh sistem. Praktika primenenija jekspertnyh ocenok. – M. LENAND, 2015. – 350 s.

Dobrov B.V., Ivanov V.V., Lukashevich N.V., Solov'ev V.D. Ontologii i tezaurusy: modeli, instrumenty, prilozhenija. – M.: Binom. Laboratorija znanij, 2009. – 173 s.

Pospelov D.A. Logiko-lingvisticheskie modeli v sistemah upravlenija. – M.: Jenergoatomizdat, 1981. – 232 s.

Mochalova A.V., Zaharov V.P., Kuznecov V.A., Mochalov V.A. Semanticheskij analiz. Nekotorye problemy obrabotki teksta. — Petrozavodsk: Izd. Dom «PIN». 2015. – 59 s.

Mikoni S.V. Formalizovannyj podhod k ustanovleniju svjazi i roli ponjatij // Komp'juternaja lingvistika i vychislitel'nye ontologii. Vypusk 2 (Trudy XXI Mezhdunarodnoj ob"edinennoj konferencii «Internet i sovremennoe obshhestvo, IMS-2018, Sankt-Peterburg, 30 maja - 2 ijunja 2018 g. Sbornik nauchnyh statej). — SPb: Universitet ITMO, 2018 S. 75-84.

Mikoni S.V. O klasse, klassifikacii i sistematizacii // Ontologija proektirovanija. 2016. T.6, #1(19). S. 67-80.

Teorija sistem i sistemnyj analiz v upravlenii organizacijami: spravochnik / Pod red. V.N. Volkovoj, A.A. Emel'janova. M.: Finansy i statistika, 2009.

Mikoni S.V. Formirovanie obobshhjonnyh pokazatelej transportnoj sistemy s pozicij zainteresovannyh storon // Ontologija proektirovanija. 2018. T. 8, #2 (28). S. 296-304.

Mikoni S.V. Teorija prinjatija upravlencheskih reshenij. - SPb: Lan', 2015. - 448 s.

Bezopasnost'//Grazhdanskaja zashhita: Jenciklopedija v 4-h tomah. T. I (A – I) – M.: FGBU VNII GOChS (FC), 2015.

Mikoni S.V. O kachestve ontologicheskih modelej // Ontologija proektirovanija. 2017. T. 7, #3 (25). S. 347-360.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Abava   FRUCT 2019

ISSN: 2307-8162