Performance evaluation model for oracles in self-executing smart contracts

Vladislav Bulgakov, Igor Gvozdevsky

Abstract


The article presents a model for evaluating the performance of oracles used in self-executing smart contracts. Performance is defined as a composite of parameters including data delivery speed, accuracy of transmitted information, and the security level of the oracle cluster. The proposed model integrates weighted data aggregation mechanisms, the application of asymmetric penalties for inaccurate results, as well as formal methods for assessing oracle quality using probabilistic models and statistical analysis. The study analyzes existing approaches to ensuring the reliability of data provided by oracles. It examines both consensus mechanisms-which allow the aggregation of information from multiple independent sources-and approaches based on the use of trusted data sources selected manually. The analysis emphasizes that traditional evaluation methods often fail to capture the dynamic nature of the system and lack the necessary flexibility to adapt to changing conditions. As a solution, an internal audit methodology for oracle clusters is proposed, enabling both quantitative and qualitative assessment of their reliability and effectiveness, which is particularly relevant for governmental and corporate blockchain systems.

Full Text:

PDF (Russian)

References


Fedoseev, S.V. “Information and Software Aspects of the Development and Application of Smart Contracts” // Legal Informatics. 2021, No. 3. DOI: 10.21681/1994-1404-2021-3-25-33.

Zhikhariev, A.G.; Kidanov, V.V.; Fefelev, O.S. “On the Issue of Information Processing Security Using Smart Contracts” // Scientific Outcome. Information Technologies. 2023, No. 1. DOI: 10.18413/2518-1092-2022-8-1-0-4.

Etherscan. “Ethereum Daily Deployed Contracts Chart” [Online]. Available: https://etherscan.io/chart/deployed-contracts (accessed: 24.02.2025).

Belikova, K.M. “A Study of Theoretical Issues of Implementing Network Contracts (Smart Contracts) Using the Example of Russia and Foreign Countries” // Social and Political Sciences. 2020, No. 5. DOI: 10.33693/2223-0092-2020-10-5-95-105.

Cong, Lin; Prasad, Eswar S.; Rabetti, Daniel. “Financial and Informational Integration Through Oracle Networks” (December 1, 2023). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4495514.

Chainlink. “Chainlink Whitepaper” [Online]. Available: https://chain.link/whitepaper (accessed: 24.02.2025).

Katsko, I.A.; Shvyryova, O.I.; Kiyok, M.O. “Modeling of Modern Trends in Risk-Oriented Auditing Using Bayes’ Theorem” // Scientific Journal of Kuban State Agrarian University, 2016, No. 115.

Egberts, Alexander. “The Oracle Problem – An Analysis of How Blockchain Oracles Undermine the Advantages of Decentralized Ledger Systems” (December 12, 2017). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3382343.

Bakaeva, O.A.; Baraboshkin, D.A. “Development of a Data Transmission Protocol Based on a Combined Encryption Algorithm” // Software Products and Systems. 2023, No. 3. DOI: 10.15827/0236-235X.142.493-502.

Smirnov, D.V.; Sotnikov, A.I.; Aseev, A.Yu. “Ensuring the Security of an Email System Against ‘Man-in-the-Middle’ Attacks Based on Blockchain” // Bulletin of Cherepovets State University. 2018, No. 4 (85). DOI: 10.23859/1994-0637-2018-4-85-4.

Mik, Eliza. “Smart Contracts and the ‘Oracle Problem’ in the Context of InsurTech” (February 13, 2023). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4390271.

Cheremushkin, A.V. “Systems with Public Keys Based on Identification Information” // PDM. 2023, No. 61. DOI: 10.17223/20710410/61/4.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Abava  Кибербезопасность ИБП для ЦОД СНЭ

ISSN: 2307-8162